People | Processes | Performance
inside the industrial plant

  • Home  
  • Reliability-Centred Maintenance: Deciding What Maintenance an Asset Actually Needs
Home › Maintenance › Maintenance & Reliability › Reliability-Centred Maintenance: Deciding What Maintenance an Asset Actually Needs
Maintenance & Reliability

Reliability-Centred Maintenance: Deciding What Maintenance an Asset Actually Needs

Not every asset needs the same level of maintenance.

Some equipment is critical to plant safety or production.

Other equipment can fail with limited consequence.

Reliability-Centred Maintenance, or RCM, provides a structured way to determine what maintenance is appropriate for different assets and failure modes.

Start With the Required Function

Before deciding how to maintain equipment, the plant needs to understand what the asset is expected to do.

For example, a pump may need to:

  • deliver a required flow
  • maintain a certain pressure
  • start on demand
  • operate continuously

Failure means being unable to perform one or more of those required functions.

Identify How the Function Can Be Lost

Equipment can fail in different ways.

A pump may:

  • stop completely
  • deliver insufficient flow
  • leak
  • vibrate excessively
  • fail to start

Each failure mode can have different causes and consequences.

RCM examines these failure modes rather than treating “pump failure” as one generic event.

Consequences Determine Priority

The importance of a failure depends on what happens next.

Possible consequences include:

  • safety impact
  • environmental impact
  • production loss
  • equipment damage
  • maintenance cost
  • little operational effect

A failure with major consequences deserves a different strategy from one with negligible impact.

The Maintenance Task Has to Be Effective

A preventive task should only be used if it meaningfully reduces the likelihood or consequence of the relevant failure.

Likewise, condition monitoring is useful only if the developing failure can actually be detected in time to act.

This prevents maintenance programmes from becoming collections of routine tasks with little connection to real failure behaviour.

Sometimes Run-to-Failure Is Reasonable

Not every asset requires preventive maintenance.

If an item is inexpensive, easily replaceable and its failure creates little consequence, allowing it to run to failure may be entirely reasonable.

The key is that this should be a deliberate decision—not neglect.

Some Problems Need Redesign Instead of More Maintenance

If an equipment failure cannot be effectively prevented or predicted, repeated maintenance may not be the answer.

A design change may be required.

Reliability improvement therefore sometimes means modifying the asset rather than increasing maintenance frequency.

Maintenance Based on Consequence

RCM changes the question from:

“How often should we maintain this equipment?”

to:

“How can this equipment fail, what happens if it does, and what is the most effective way to manage that risk?”

That makes maintenance strategy more closely connected to actual plant reliability.

People | Processes | Performance

inside the industrial plant 

© 2026 The Plant Insider. All rights reserved.